Sunday, September 04, 2011

This Sermon Is Not About You

This sermon was heard at the First Presbyterian Church in Marshall, Texas on Sunday September 4, 2011, the 23rd Sunday in Ordinary Time.

Podcast of "This Sermon Is Not About You" (MP3)

Exodus 12:1-14
Psalm 149
Romans 13:8-14
Matthew 18:15-20

May the words of my mouth and the meditations of our hearts be acceptable to you, O Lord, our Rock and our Redeemer.  Amen

When I started writing the sermon early last week, I had a beautiful illustration for how to make it look like two people were following 18:15-17 from our reading this morning, Christ’s directions to his disciples on conflict resolution. Now as I cryptically said, the illustration made it “look like” they were following Christ’s directions, but truly they weren’t.

After sharing the illustration I was going to say “But this sermon is not about them, and it’s not about you either.” As it would happen, on Wednesday Al told me that I needed to take a look at the web site he checks for children’s sermons. The next day at Lectio Divina, the group that meets on Thursday to study the gospel reading, I was given more food for thought. Then I read an article on line that asked the pastoral question “Are You a Preacher or a Motivational Speaker?” At that point, the old illustration was worthless.

The children’s sermon Al shared with me was wonderful. I won’t share the whole text with you, but here’s the Reader’s Digest condensed version:

Once upon a time there were two brothers. When their father died, they inherited and split their father’s farm and continued in the family business. One day, one of them offended the other over a slight that is now long forgotten.

Then one day, a carpenter visited one of the brothers and asked if there was any work for him. The farmer-brother said yes, there was work. He wanted the carpenter to build a fence along the stream that split their property so he didn’t have to see his brother again.

At the end of the day, the farmer came to check on the carpenter’s work only to discover that instead of building a wall, he built a bridge. Shocked at the work, he was even more amazed to see his brother on the other side. “After all the terrible things I’ve done to you over the years, I can't believe that you would build a bridge and welcome me back.”[1] He then reached out to his brother and gave him a big hug.

After the two men made amends, the brother that hired the carpenter went home. The farmer asked the carpenter to stay. The carpenter replied “No, I have more bridges to build.”

There are several ways to interpret scripture, among them are descriptive and prescriptive. The descriptive way of interpreting scripture interprets through explanation, a grand rephrasing of the word of God for the people of God. I tend to do a lot of this. My original illustration, the one I talked about at the beginning, would have made a wonderful segue into describing verses 15-17. I would have described how this biblical conflict resolution process works and how important it is to use it.

I would have said that those three verses show us how to make amends when a brother, fellow disciple, member of the church has sinned against you. It keeps it small and intimate until the whole church is involved and it does keep the sin within the church. What starts between the disciples should remain in the church.

It’s not bad as descriptions go; at least it wasn’t bad before I was reminded there’s something better.

The prescriptive interpretation of scripture does something different. The prescriptive interpretation doesn’t describe the text. Like a prescription helps make a sick body better, the prescriptive interpretation helps us use the text in our lives. It helps make us better disciples. A prescriptive interpretation of this scripture is the basis of that children’s sermon. The prescriptive interpretation reminds us that Christ makes amends for us and between us. Christ makes amends between us and our God.

Christ bridges the gap. Christ closes the chasms and schisms that are so old that we don’t remember their particulars anymore. Yes, we can remember broad brush strokes of the sins, but the details are gone like yesterday’s news.

The glory of this prescription is that while it is humanity’s first inclination to want to build walls between us, Christ will have nothing to do with that. When something comes between disciples, between brothers and sisters in Christ, our Lord is there building bridges instead of walls.

How wonderful is that? Our God saves! Even when we try to build walls God builds bridges and saves us from ourselves bringing us to reconciliation.

On Thursday, this was going through my mind as we were reading Matthew 18:15-20 in our study. On a side note, during the announcements Al always says that everyone is invited to join the study in the chapel at 10:00 Thursday mornings. As he has said, we read and we discuss, we listen and we pray. It’s not a lecture. Because of this, insights that are new (at least to me) and glorious are shared regularly.

One of the things that came up on Thursday was a wonderful and glorious interpretation that helps define church for all of us. One of the participants, Tom Malcolm, noted that in verse 20, Jesus says “For where two or three are gathered in my name, I am there among them.” Now, that’s nothing new, this is the kind of scripture that has helped define the church for nearly 2,000 years. What made this more special was how he related it to the first part of our reading.

He reminded us verse 15 begins, “If your brother sins against you…” and ends saying “between the two of you.” Friends, intelligence is often complex and complicated, but great wisdom often comes in the very simplest of words. Let me paraphrase the point made on Thursday. He told us verse 15 has two people, the sinner and the sinned against, when they come together in Jesus’ name, Christ is among them.

I love this insight. I absolutely love it. In verses 15-17, this is a particular brother member of the church, who was sinned against by another particular brother member of the church. They are disciples, but they are individuals.

In the last three verses, the “you” Jesus is talking about is the Church, his Church. The two in verse fifteen, by coming together in Jesus’ holy name come together as the Church, the capital “C” church. They don’t form a denomination or a congregation; they come together as members of the Body of Christ, they come together as the Church.

This is important for all of us; there are times when we do not agree with one another. There are times when people will be hurt by the actions of another member of the Body of Christ. There are times when members of the same denomination or congregation hurt one another.

So now not only do we have a scriptural conflict resolution process (and good, holy tools are never a bad thing), we have a savior who is the bridge between two in conflict. Even more so, when two parties are gathered in the name of the Lord, especially when it’s two members, one who has sinned against the other, Jesus promises he is there with them.

Then I read the article by Sherman Haywood Cox II on the difference between preaching and motivational speaking. He contends that a lot of preaching, popular preaching, what passes for relevant preaching, is nothing more than changing “the title from the latest pop-psychologist’s seminar from “how to succeed” to “how to fulfill God’s purpose” where God’s purpose is defined as “succeeding in this life.”[2]

He points out that hearing this kind of message may be helpful and useful, but it’s not the gospel. He laments that often this Gospel Lite is no more than learning “a skill or a mindset that will help [the listener] finally break the boundaries that keep them from that promotion.”[3] It’s nice, but it’s not the Good News.

He says that where good motivational speaking from the pulpit breaks down is that it lacks two things, the cross and the coming kingdom of God. He also tells preachers and other readers to beware. You have to beware of sticking Jesus on the end so that it sounds Christian. The cross is central, the cross is necessary.

This week’s edition of “Presbyterians Today” magazine includes an article called “Questions Muslims ask Christians.” One of the questions was “Why do you believe that Jesus suffered and died on the cross?”[4]

The answer begins reminding the reader that Muslims don’t consider Jesus the Son of God, though they consider him a great prophet and within their theology a Messiah. They also believe that God, the God of Abraham, would have never allowed the murder of such a great prophet. Another belief they don’t share is original sin, so they don’t share our concept of the sacrifice of the Lamb of God for the atonement of sin. No original sin, no need for the sacrifice.

From the pulpit I must proclaim and as disciples we must to live that through Christ’s death, even death on the cross, Jesus died for the sin of the world. Our Creator knew us so well that even before we were created there would have to be someone who would build bridges between us and God, between each of us and all of us. “Jesus humanity and suffering communicate the extraordinary lengths to which our Creator has gone to lavish extravagant love upon sinful humanity.”[5]

As I said, this sermon is not about you. One of the reasons I say this is because I remember when I was in my 20’s I began to wonder if my pastor wasn’t following me around all day so that he could say something from the pulpit on Sunday that was intended just for me. I knew this wasn’t true, but it was uncanny the way he seemed to fashion messages that directly convicted me.

I don’t want anyone to think that I am indicting someone about a particular situation. I’m not. But let me say this, this sermon is not about you but it is for all of us. It is for the church. It is for the disciples. It is for the people of God. If that convicts each of us and all of us, that’s as it should be.

We are called to remember it is our Lord who takes the wood of the cross and builds bridges so that we may be one as his Body, one in his Church. This is the coming of the kingdom on Earth. We are called to go across those bridges and seek those who have sinned against us, and those who we’ve sinned against. Once a bridge is built, we can’t make anyone walk across it, but Jesus knew that too. But we also know that when two or three come together, Christ is there with them, together in his name they are the Church. This is necessary because of our sin and this redemption is only possible through his life, death, and resurrection.

I could go on and describe this passage all day, but I would rather us use this as a prescription that brings the body together than share another description. Truly, this prescription for forgiveness is a tonic for the troops.

[1] “Building Bridges,” http://sermons4kids.com/building_bridges.htm, retrieved August 31, 2011.
[2] “Are You a Preacher or a Motivational Speaker?” http://www.churchleaders.com/pastors/preaching-teaching/153625-are-you-a-preacher-or-motivational-speaker.html, retrieved September 1, 2011.
[3] Ibid.
[4] Perkins, Mitali, “Faith Seeking Understanding: Questions Muslims Ask Christians.” Presbyterians Today. Vol. 101, No. 7, September 2011, p 4.
[5] Ibid.

No comments:

Post a Comment